NATIONWIDE ADU
NATIONAL OVERVIEW

Which US States Require ADUs By Right —
Is Yours on the List?

Published June 8, 2026 · Updated September 18, 2026 By Nationwide ADU Research 8 min read

In 2018, fewer than five states had statewide ADU preemption laws. As of September 2026, 19 states have an effective statewide ADU law on the books, 3 more have passed one that's still being phased in, and 1 (Virginia) has a law signed but not yet in effect — 28 states still leave ADU regulation entirely to city and county governments. This breakdown reflects NationwideADU's own state-by-state legal review — the same classification used on each state's own cost-guide page — verified directly against each state's enacted bill text rather than secondary aggregator counts, which sometimes use looser definitions and arrive at higher totals. If you've been told ADUs "aren't allowed" in your city, your state law may have changed that.

19
States with an effective statewide ADU law
28
Local control only
3
Laws passed, in implementation transition
1
Signed, not yet effective (Virginia, 2027)

States With an Effective Statewide ADU Law (19)

These 19 states (plus Washington, DC) have a statewide law in force today that requires municipalities to allow ADUs on single-family lots — some universally, some gated by city/county population size. Local governments can still regulate design, setbacks, and size within state parameters, but cannot outright prohibit ADUs where the law applies.

Arizona
HB 2720 (2024) / HB 2928 (2025) · Cities over 75,000 residents
Effective
Arkansas
Act 313 of 2025
Effective
California
Multiple bills since 2016 · Most extensive ADU framework in the US
Effective
Colorado
HB 24-1152 (2024) · Jurisdictions in the state's 5 Metro Planning Organizations
Effective
Connecticut
Public Act 21-29 (2021) · Municipal opt-out window closed permanently Jan 1, 2023
Effective
Iowa
SF 592, signed May 1, 2025, effective July 1, 2025
Effective
Kansas
SB 418, signed April 7, 2026 · By-right approval
Effective
Maine
30-A M.R.S. § 4364-B (LD 2003, 2022)
Effective
Massachusetts
Affordable Homes Act (2024) · ADU provisions effective Feb 2, 2025
Effective
Montana
Mont. Code Ann. § 76-2-345 (SB 528, 2023) · Upheld by MT Supreme Court, March 2026
Effective
Nevada
AB 396 (2025) · Cities over 60,000 / counties over 100,000 residents
Effective
New Hampshire
RSA 674:71-73 (2016), strengthened to as-of-right by HB 577 (2025)
Effective
Oregon
ORS 197A.425 (SB 1051)
Effective
Rhode Island
R.I. Gen. Laws § 45-24-73
Effective
Utah
Utah Code § 10-9a-530 (2021) for internal ADUs; SB284 (2026) extends to detached ADUs
Effective
Vermont
Act 47 (2023) / HOME Act
Effective
Washington
HB 1337 / RCW 36.70A.681 (2023); EHB 1345 (2026) added rural DADU allowance
Effective
Washington, DC
District-wide zoning allows ADUs in all residential zones
Effective
West Virginia
SB 659, signed March 14, 2026, effective June 4, 2026
Effective
In Implementation Transition (3)

These states have passed a statewide law, but counties/cities are still in the process of updating their local codes to comply.

Hawaii
Act 39 of 2024 (SB 3202) · Counties still implementing county-level rules
Transition
Idaho
SB 1354, effective July 1, 2026 · Covered cities have until Feb 1, 2027 to update local codes
Transition
Maryland
HB 1466 / Chapter 197 (2025) · Phased in where public water/sewer exists
Transition
Signed, Not Yet Effective (1)
Virginia
SB 531 (Ch. 895), signed April 13, 2026 · Takes effect July 1, 2027
Future

States Without a Statewide ADU Law — Local Control (28)

These states leave ADU regulation entirely to city and county governments — allowance and rules vary by municipality. A few have specific local quirks worth noting; most simply have no statewide framework at all.

Alabama
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Alaska
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Delaware
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Florida
Fla. Stat. § 163.31771 authorizes but doesn't require local ADU ordinances; SB 184 (2025) died
Local Only
Georgia
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Illinois
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Indiana
HB 1001 / Public Law 73 (2026) created a statutory ADU definition + study mandate, not a by-right rule
Local Only
Kentucky
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Louisiana
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Michigan
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Minnesota
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Mississippi
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Missouri
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Nebraska
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
New Jersey
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
New Mexico
No statewide law — HB 425 (2023) died in committee
Local Only
New York
No statewide law — NYC's City of Yes (2024) and "ADU For You" portal (2026) are city-level programs
Local Only
North Carolina
HB 627/S 495 passed 2 House committees, then withdrawn May 2025 — stalled, not law
Local Only
North Dakota
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Ohio
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Oklahoma
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Pennsylvania
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
South Carolina
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
South Dakota
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Tennessee
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Texas
No statewide law — Houston has no zoning at all; deed restrictions control there instead
Local Only
Wisconsin
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only
Wyoming
No statewide law — city/county rules control
Local Only

Check Your State's ADU Laws

Our full 50-state ADU legal reference includes preemption status, owner-occupancy rules, and key legislation for every state.

View Full ADU Laws by State →

Why the Reform Wave Happened — and What's Next

The drivers of the reform wave

The 2019–2026 ADU reform wave has three primary drivers. First, a worsening housing affordability crisis in virtually every US metropolitan area — ADUs offer a politically viable way to increase housing supply without the controversy of high-density rezoning. Second, bipartisan political support — effective statewide ADU laws are now on the books in both deep-blue states (California, Massachusetts, Rhode Island) and deep-red states (Montana, Utah, Arizona, Idaho). Third, the California template — California's experience showing that ADU reform dramatically increases housing production without significant adverse effects gave other state legislatures a proven model to follow.

What's likely next

Housing-policy researchers broadly expect more states to consider statewide ADU preemption in coming legislative sessions, following the pattern of the past several years. We don't speculate here about which specific states will pass legislation next or when — bills get introduced, amended, stalled, and re-referred constantly (North Carolina's HB 627/S 495 is a recent example: it passed two House committees, was calendared for a floor vote, then withdrawn the same day). We track actual enacted outcomes on each state's own page and in the table above rather than forecasting votes.

What an effective statewide law does NOT mean

Even in the 19 states with an effective statewide framework, ADUs are not unrestricted. Municipalities generally retain authority to regulate setbacks (within state minimums), maximum size (up to state maximums), height, design compatibility, and historic district standards. What these laws eliminate is the ability to simply prohibit ADUs entirely — or, in most of these states, to impose owner-occupancy requirements. Several of these laws are also population- or jurisdiction-gated rather than universal (Colorado, Nevada, Arizona, Idaho, and Utah's new detached-ADU coverage all work this way) — always check your specific municipality's current standards alongside state law.

Sources